avonlake.city
Independent public-record project
Not affiliated with the city or schools
Your place, explained · Avon Lake · reviewed private redevelopment site

The former lakefront power plant site

What the public record documents about this place, what it does not, and where each fact comes from. Explore the evidence, the land, the dated events, the salient figures, and the stages the archive can and cannot show.

Bundle schema 1 · parcel generation 9e1f999f-48df-4b0f-b18b-e7be5d573c68 · newest source fetched 2026-10-07T14:28:13Z · 15 receipts
Scope
Every fact below is scoped to the named parcels. Facts that cannot be computed at another scale say so in place. Without script, every scope's values are listed under Salient facts.
The evidence · Read by topic

Understand the proposal. Check the record.

Start with the topic that matters to you. All 42 entries from the claim census remain available below, including missing records, limitations and disclosures.

Counts show entries with explicit receipt IDs, not a new verification verdict. Cross-topic claims appear once. Identity-only receipts have no public URL by policy.

Land ownership 12 claims · 8 with receipt IDs Parcel boundaries, acreage and recorded transfers. A transfer record proves neither payment nor its absence. No survey is in the archive. View evidence +Close evidence −

Claim 8

Four named commercial/utility parcels are drawn from the 2026-07-28 county generation with the stated approximate GIS acreages.

Receipt / basis: r6331989

View on page #q-land View on page #map

`attested.questions.q-land.answer` · s08 · sha256:23cb5b5fe6eb

Claim 9

The ordinance's 43.23 acres names the three lakefront parcels, not the Walker Road parcel.

Receipt / basis: r2897666 · r8425219

View on page #q-land

`attested.questions.q-land.answer` · s09 · sha256:03fe0ef3bc6f

Claim 10

The 2021 conveyance moved seven parcels, four on this page.

Receipt / basis: r460988

View on page #q-land

`attested.questions.q-land.answer` · s10 · sha256:59d580c4ad0f

Claim 13

The 43.23-acre number is the city's rezoning figure.

Receipt / basis: r2897666

View on page #fact-acreage_total

`attested.facts.acreage_total.label` · s13 · sha256:66a054328a8b

Claim 14

Ordinance 26-37 states 43.23 acres for parcels 101-085, 101-023, and 101-022 north of Lake Road.

Receipt / basis: r2897666 · r8425219

View on page #fact-acreage_total

`attested.facts.acreage_total.tells_us` · s14 · sha256:dc9f8fd40b9d

Claim 15

It is not a four-parcel sum; the Walker Road parcel adds about 47 GIS acres.

Receipt / basis: r6331989

View on page #fact-acreage_total

`attested.facts.acreage_total.tells_us` · s15 · sha256:21d55196d703

Claim 16

Parcel 101-085 differs by source: 41.41 auditor acres versus about 40.3 GIS acres; the ordinance gives 43.23 for three parcels together.

Receipt / basis: r6331989 · r2897666

View on page #fact-acreage_total

`attested.facts.acreage_total.unknown` · s16 · sha256:3ac317450a4a

Claim 17

No survey is in the archive.

Receipt / basis: limitation

View on page #fact-acreage_total

`attested.facts.acreage_total.unknown` · s17 · sha256:04e3ad260654

Claim 18

Stored conveyances for the four parcels record no consideration, with the stated 2021/2022 and 2007 deed details.

Receipt / basis: r460988 · r11069242

View on page #fact-deeds_no_consideration

`attested.facts.deeds_no_consideration.tells_us` · s18 · sha256:342f54612d77

Claim 20

A transfer record proves neither payment nor its absence.

Receipt / basis: evidence guardrail

View on page #fact-deeds_no_consideration

`attested.facts.deeds_no_consideration.unknown` · s20 · sha256:208d9e94b437

Claim 42

Parcel identifiers are shown only for this reviewed non-residential place; owner, taxpayer, mailing, contact, and household fields are excluded.

Receipt / basis: registry disclosure · privacy check

View on page #methods

fixed disclosure · —
Public finance 9 claims · 6 with receipt IDs The proposed purchase price, TIF terms and financing gaps. No site TIF ordinance, school approval or payment record is in this archive. Council counts are city-wide. View evidence +Close evidence −

Claim 2

The 2024-10-08 press release put the planned purchase at $15 million from TIF revenue.

Receipt / basis: r15695302 · r13817166

View on page #q-proposed

`attested.questions.q-proposed.answer` · s02 · sha256:32578899c7ee

Claim 7

No site TIF ordinance, purchase closing, or school approval is in the archive.

Receipt / basis: limitation

View on page #q-approved View on page #stages

`attested.questions.q-approved.answer` · s07 · sha256:f9abc870631e

Claim 29

The 2024 IDA set the city contribution at the lesser of $15 million or 25% of expected TIF revenue.

Receipt / basis: r728468

View on page #fact-planned_purchase

`attested.facts.planned_purchase.tells_us` · s29 · sha256:5bb6422cd3ee

Claim 30

The 2025 agreement describes up to $15 million, bounded by the stated TIF-percentage, purchaser-acceptance, appraisal, and acreage terms.

Receipt / basis: r13856185 · r13817166

View on page #fact-planned_purchase

`attested.facts.planned_purchase.tells_us` · s30 · sha256:3a42ab4d781b

Claim 31

The agreement says TIF proceeds and no city funds.

Receipt / basis: r13856185

View on page #fact-planned_purchase

`attested.facts.planned_purchase.tells_us` · s31 · sha256:5cb1701d8dd8

Claim 33

No such record is in the archive.

Receipt / basis: limitation

View on page #fact-planned_purchase

`attested.facts.planned_purchase.unknown` · s33 · sha256:df5d704bd848
Remediation 6 claims · 5 with receipt IDs Flood mapping and nearby environmental records. These rows do not establish cleanup completion or exposure. Drainage counts are county-wide. View evidence +Close evidence −

Claim 22

FEMA zones do not describe all flood risk, and the intersection is parcel geometry rather than a structure.

Receipt / basis: evidence guardrail

View on page #fact-flood_intersection

`attested.facts.flood_intersection.unknown` · s22 · sha256:7e0d9fbc45d2
Redevelopment 15 claims · 8 with receipt IDs The proposed park, council actions and project stages. Approval is not completion. The archive does not explain the 19.6 / 20.01-acre difference. View evidence +Close evidence −

Claim 1

A mixed-use redevelopment is proposed by ALERG, with the city to acquire about 23.22 of 43.23 acres for a public park.

Receipt / basis: r15695302

View on page #q-proposed

`attested.questions.q-proposed.answer` · s01 · sha256:4b7c783342bc

Claim 3

No developer, final plan, or construction record is in the archive.

Receipt / basis: limitation

View on page #q-proposed

`attested.questions.q-proposed.answer` · s03 · sha256:13eab3000167

Claim 4

Council passed five named actions from 2024–2026.

Receipt / basis: r728468 · r13856185 · r366892 · r9174090 · r2897666; all five linked beside the answer

View on page #q-approved

`attested.questions.q-approved.answer` · s04 · sha256:f2d5564f0589

Claim 5

Ordinance 26-36 is a general overlay chapter requested by ALERG and does not identify the page parcels.

Receipt / basis: r9174090

View on page #q-approved

`attested.questions.q-approved.answer` · s05 · sha256:90cde275917a

Claim 6

Approval is not a completed purchase, and an approved grant application is not an award.

Receipt / basis: state guardrail

View on page #q-approved

`attested.questions.q-approved.answer` · s06 · sha256:eeeb1b825957

Claim 11

The answer enumerates the transfer, GIS, council, press-release, FEMA, attested, and pinned-brief sources used by the page.

Receipt / basis: receipt list

View on page #q-records

`attested.questions.q-records.answer` · s11 · sha256:ae19ebf6afa3

Claim 12

Supporting records are linked where policy permits; FEMA and pinned figures/briefs are identity-only.

Receipt / basis: r14190150 · r8425219 · r313266 · r13817166 · r7642512 · r9128318

View on page #q-records View on page #receipts

`attested.questions.q-records.answer` · s12 · sha256:a98c143d9a3d

Claim 23

The 2024 IDA commits the city to negotiate for an approximately 23.22-acre park shown on an exhibit.

Receipt / basis: r728468 · r313266

View on page #fact-park_acreage

`attested.facts.park_acreage.tells_us` · s23 · sha256:ee0d87f6b2ae

Claim 24

The 2024-10-08 press release calls the remaining private-development area 19.6 acres.

Receipt / basis: r15695302

View on page #fact-park_acreage

`attested.facts.park_acreage.tells_us` · s24 · sha256:2a40631133d7

Claim 25

43.23 minus 23.22 is 20.01 acres, a 0.41-acre difference the archive does not explain.

Receipt / basis: r15695302 · r8425219 · r313266; arithmetic disclosed

View on page #fact-park_acreage

`attested.facts.park_acreage.tells_us` · s25 · sha256:7f8cb7af5165

Claim 26

The park acreage is planned agreement land, not a recorded parcel line.

Receipt / basis: r728468

View on page #fact-park_acreage

`attested.facts.park_acreage.tells_us` · s26 · sha256:3e05a7c6268a

Claim 27

The final boundary and reason for the 19.6/20.01 difference are unknown.

Receipt / basis: limitation

View on page #fact-park_acreage

`attested.facts.park_acreage.unknown` · s27 · sha256:8aae1ac0cb19

Claim 28

No plat, survey, or closing document is in the archive.

Receipt / basis: limitation

View on page #fact-park_acreage

`attested.facts.park_acreage.unknown` · s28 · sha256:5ecda96a2b7b

Claim 34

Proposed and approved are documented; financed, paid, and delivered are `none_in_archive`.

Receipt / basis: registry `project_stages`

View on page #stages

derived stages · —

Claim 41

`arch`/newest-fetch is the newest stored fetch among all evidence classes used by the page, not publication date.

Receipt / basis: `generation.newest_fetched_at`

View on page #events View on page #methods

derived archive date · —

Continue to the full place record · All receipts · Methods and disclosure

QuestionWhat the record documentsStateSource
What has been proposed? A mixed-use redevelopment of the former power plant site, proposed by its owner of record, Avon Lake Environmental Redevelopment Group LLC, with the city to acquire about 23.22 acres of the 43.23-acre lakefront property for a public park. The city's press release of October 8, 2024 put the planned land purchase at $15 million, to be paid from tax increment financing revenue. No developer, final development plan, or construction record is in this archive. Proposed R15695302 · source
What has actually been approved? Council has passed an interim development agreement for the former power plant site (Ordinance 24-143, November 12, 2024); a real estate purchase agreement for about 23 acres (Ordinance 25-167, November 24, 2025); an application for a state brownfield assessment grant (Resolution 25-182, November 24, 2025); the Lakefront Mixed-Use Overlay District code chapter (Ordinance 26-36, May 18, 2026); and the rezoning of the 43.23-acre site north of Lake Road to Special Commerce District (Ordinance 26-37, May 18, 2026). Ordinance 26-36 creates a general overlay chapter requested by Avon Lake Environmental Redevelopment Group LLC; it does not itself identify this page's parcels. An approved agreement is not a completed purchase, and an approved application is not an award. No tax increment financing ordinance for the site, no closing on the 23-acre purchase, and no school-district approval of the financing is in this archive. Approved All five decision sources: R728468 R366892 R13856185 R2897666 R9174090
Which land is involved? Four county parcels, all drawn from the county parcel generation published July 28, 2026 and recorded there as class Commercial, land use Utility: 04-00-005-000-103 (about 47 acres by county geometry, on Walker Road), 04-00-006-101-085 (about 40 acres, the generating-plant parcel), and the two small lakefront parcels 04-00-006-101-023 and 04-00-006-101-022 (about 1.1 and 0.7 acres). The 43.23-acre property named in the 2026 rezoning ordinance is 101-085 with 101-023 and 101-022; the Walker Road parcel is not part of that figure. The 2021 conveyance that brought the property to its owner of record moved seven parcels, four of them on this page. Recorded R6331989 · source
Which records establish this? The records behind this page are county auditor transfer records (the tax-year 2021 general warranty deed recorded October 24, 2022 as conveyance 2022094719 for all four parcels, and a 2007 record for the two small lakefront parcels); the county GIS parcel generation published July 28, 2026; five council actions read from stored legislation (2024 to 2026); the city's press release of October 8, 2024; the FEMA flood layer as stored; three figures already attested on the case page (the total acreage, the park acreage, and the planned purchase price); and, for the city and county scopes only, figures pinned on this site's council and environment briefs. The receipt list identifies these supporting records and links them where publication policy permits; the FEMA layer, attested figures, and pinned briefs are shown by identity only. Recorded R6331989 · source · Receipt list ↓

Where it is

Parcel outlines from county GIS generation 9e1f999f-48df-4b0f-b18b-e7be5d573c68 · flood zones, facilities, and permits from the sources named in each label · nearby records measured within the declared radius from the parcel boundary · checked-in reference geography source: County outline: Esri Living Atlas; Municipal boundaries: Ohio OGRIP / GEOhio; included when drawable subject geometry is available · drawn at build time, no tile base map
Nearby records: within 500 m of the parcel boundary FEMA flood zone VE FEMA flood zone AE FEMA flood zone AE FEMA flood zone AE Parcel 04-00-005-000-103 (utility) Parcel 04-00-006-101-085 (utility) Parcel 04-00-006-101-023 (utility) Parcel 04-00-006-101-022 (utility) 005-000-103 006-101-085 006-101-023 006-101-022 PHIL'S SHELL SERVICE · inside or touching a site parcel · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 Watteredge LLC · inside or touching a site parcel · lorain_county_gis_parcels Unnamed facility · inside or touching a site parcel · lorain_county_gis_parcels AVON LAKE POWER PLANT (0247030013) · inside or touching a site parcel · oh_epa_gis_npdes_permits Southwire Avon Lake · inside or touching a site parcel · lorain_county_gis_parcels LIQUID THERAPY · inside or touching a site parcel · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 AVON LAKE POWER PLANT · inside or touching a site parcel · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 Lubrizol Advanced Materials - Avon Lake · 3 m · lorain_county_gis_parcels LUBRIZOL ADVANCED MATERIALS · 3 m · lorain_county_gis_parcels Ford Motor Co Ohio Assembly Plant · 31 m · lorain_county_gis_parcels AVIENT CORP · 35 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 MEXICHEM SPECIALTY RESINS INC · 53 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 ALUMALLOY METALCASTING CO. · 64 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 ARROW ALUMINUM CASTINGS CO · 113 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 ALUMALLOY METALCASTING CO. · 121 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 FORD MOTOR CO - OHIO ASSEMBLY PLANT · 160 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 HELICAL LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY (0247030987) · 174 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 CENTRAL TRUST CO · 203 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 WATTEREDGE LLC · 207 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 RYKON ACQUISITIONS LLC DBA RYKON PLATING · 227 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 ERIE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES · 241 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 AVON LAKE WPCF · 249 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 Avon Lake WPCF · 260 m · oh_epa_gis_npdes_permits Unnamed facility · 316 m · lorain_county_gis_parcels Avon Lake Regional Water · 316 m · lorain_county_gis_parcels AVON LAKE REGIONAL WATER · 316 m · lorain_county_gis_parcels Ford Ohio Assembly Plant · 335 m · oh_epa_gis_npdes_permits WESTVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL · 344 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 AVON LAKE WATER FILTRATION PLANT · 368 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 ALERG, LLC · 463 m · oh_epa_gis_npdes_permits ALERG, LLC · 463 m · oh_epa_gis_npdes_permits AVON LAKE MARATHON · 482 m · epa_envirofacts_echo_44012 32 facilities within radius, listed with distance and source below the map Permit, 106 m from the parcel boundary Permit, 363 m from the parcel boundary Permit, 409 m from the parcel boundary Permit, 494 m from the parcel boundary 4 permits within radius 1000 m N
Solid outline place parcel Hatched flood zone Large point facility, labelled by distance and source Small point permit
  • 04-00-005-000-103 · utility · drawn from county GIS
  • 04-00-006-101-085 · utility · drawn from county GIS
  • 04-00-006-101-023 · utility · drawn from county GIS
  • 04-00-006-101-022 · utility · drawn from county GIS

Proximity is not exposure. A facility inside the 500 m radius is shown with its distance and its source. Nothing here establishes ownership, responsibility, or a health effect.

What happened, in order

Dates: eff took effect · obs observed by this archive · arch archive snapshot: newest source fetch behind this page (see Methods).
Salient facts · this site

The numbers worth knowing, each with what it does and does not tell you.

Rezoned property, the city's figure

43.23 acres

2026 · attested

What this tells us43.23 acres is Ordinance 26-37's figure for parcels 04-00-006-101-085, 04-00-006-101-023 and 04-00-006-101-022, the property north of Lake Road. It is not a sum of this page's four parcels: the Walker Road parcel 04-00-005-000-103 adds about 47 acres by county geometry.
What remains unknownAcreage for parcel 04-00-006-101-085 differs by source: 41.41 acres in the auditor's record and about 40.3 acres from the county GIS geometry, while the ordinance states one 43.23-acre figure for the three parcels together. No survey is in this archive.
Open the sourceR2897666 · ORDINANCE NO. 26-37: AN ORDINANCE REZONING A 43.23-ACRE SITE AT [street number withheld] LAKE ROAD FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (I-2) AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE (R-1A) TO SPECIAL COMMERCE DISTRICT (B-3). · retrieved 2026-07-10; R8425219 · Attested home-page figure acreage_total_display: 43.23 ac total · retrieved pinned; R6331989 · Lorain County GIS parcel publication, generation 9e1f999f-48df-4b0f-b18b-e7be5d573c68 · retrieved 2026-10-07

Planned park land

23.22 acres

2024 · attested

What this tells usThe interim development agreement (Ordinance 24-143, November 2024) commits the city to negotiate for a public park of approximately 23.22 acres on the property, shown on an exhibit map. The city's October 8, 2024 press release calls the remaining private-development area 19.6 acres. Subtracting 23.22 from the published 43.23-acre figure yields 20.01 acres, a 0.41-acre difference the archive does not explain. The park acreage is a planned acquisition described in an agreement, not a recorded parcel line.
What remains unknownThe final park boundary and the reason for the 19.6/20.01-acre difference. No plat, survey, or closing document is in this archive.
Open the sourceR728468 · ORDINANCE NO. 24-143: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH AVON LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL REDEVELOPMENT GROUP AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. · retrieved 2026-07-10; R313266 · Attested home-page figure acreage_park_display: 23.22 ac public park · retrieved pinned; R15695302 · Avon Lake and Power Plant Site Owners Discuss Development Agreement That Includes City Ownership of 23 Acres of Lakefront Land · retrieved 2026-07-15; R8425219 · Attested home-page figure acreage_total_display: 43.23 ac total · retrieved pinned

Planned public purchase

$15,000,000

2025 · attested

What this tells usThe 2024 interim development agreement set the city's contribution at the lesser of $15 million or 25% of expected tax increment financing revenue. The 2025 real estate purchase agreement describes a price of up to $15 million: the lesser of $15 million, 25% of TIF proceeds (or a different percentage acceptable to the purchaser), and appraised value, with an acreage adjustment. It says the city will use TIF proceeds and no city funds.
What remains unknownWhether a TIF district for the site has been created, whether the school district has approved it, and whether any part of the price has been paid. No such record is in this archive.
Open the sourceR13856185 · ORDINANCE NO. 25-167: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AVON LAKE AND AVON LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL REDEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, FOR THE ACQUIS… · retrieved 2026-07-10; R728468 · ORDINANCE NO. 24-143: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH AVON LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL REDEVELOPMENT GROUP AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. · retrieved 2026-07-10; R13817166 · City TIF / development agreement, 2025 (23.22 acres for a public lakefront park) · retrieved pinned

Recorded consideration on transfer

$0

2 of 2 recorded conveyances without consideration · 2007–2022 · observed

What this tells usThe county recorded every stored conveyance of the four parcels with no consideration: the tax-year 2021 general warranty deed recorded October 24, 2022 (conveyance 2022094719; exempt code EX; valid sale: no) that moved all four, and a 2007 record for the two small lakefront parcels (conveyance 2007094625; the auditor record states no instrument; valid sale: yes; consideration 0).
What remains unknownWhat, if anything, was paid privately. A transfer record is not evidence of a payment or of its absence.
Open the sourceR11069242 · instrument not stated on the auditor record · retrieved 2026-10-07; R460988 · GENERAL WARRANTY DEED · retrieved 2026-10-07

Flood zone intersection

3 of 4 parcels

4 · current county GIS generation · derived

What this tells usThe count above is the number of drawn parcels whose county geometry intersects a FEMA special flood hazard zone (zones AE and VE along the shoreline) on the stored flood layer.
What remains unknownFEMA zones do not describe all flood risk, and the intersection is on parcel geometry, not on any structure.
Open the sourceR14190150 · FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer, Lorain County panels (2284 zones) · retrieved 2026-07-27; R6331989 · Lorain County GIS parcel publication, generation 9e1f999f-48df-4b0f-b18b-e7be5d573c68 · retrieved 2026-10-07

Facility records within the radius

32 facility records

current county GIS generation · derived

What this tells us32 facility records with an authority-gated location fall within 500 metres of the site boundary; 10 records located within the radius were withheld because their parcel is residential or its land use is not proved in the active county GIS generation. Proximity is not exposure: a distance says nothing about ownership, responsibility, or a health effect.
What remains unknown0 active facility records with only a legacy point inside the radius have no authority-gated location and are not counted. A record count says nothing about what each facility does, whether it operates, or what it emits.
Open the sourceR6331989 · Lorain County GIS parcel publication, generation 9e1f999f-48df-4b0f-b18b-e7be5d573c68 · retrieved 2026-10-07

Permits within the radius

4 permit records

current county GIS generation · derived

What this tells us4 geocoded city permit records fall within 500 metres of the site boundary; 1 record within the radius was withheld because their parcel is residential or its land use is not proved in the active county GIS generation. Each is shown as a point and a distance; its address is not shown.
What remains unknownWhat each permit was for, whether it was issued, and whether the work happened. Only stored permit records with a location are counted; the source is the city permit portal as stored.
Open the sourceR6331989 · Lorain County GIS parcel publication, generation 9e1f999f-48df-4b0f-b18b-e7be5d573c68 · retrieved 2026-10-07

Council matters with a published roll-call

206 matters

through 2026-07-13 · derived

What this tells usThe council brief publishes 206 matters of the current council with a machine-readable roll-call, city-wide. The decisions linked on this page are editor-reviewed council actions; no count of them is recomputed here.
What remains unknownHow many of those matters concern this place. The link from a decision to a place is editorial (see the decisions above), not a keyword count.
Open the sourceR7642512 · avonlake.city council brief, pinned figures (council_figures.json, version 1) · retrieved pinned

Council matters with an exact declared recusal

1 matters

through 2026-07-13 · derived

What this tells usThe council brief publishes 1 current-council matter with an exact declared recusal, city-wide. This page prints no roll-call or recusal for its own decisions.
What remains unknownWhether any recusal concerned this place. The brief's recusal figure is not joined to any place.
Open the sourceR7642512 · avonlake.city council brief, pinned figures (council_figures.json, version 1) · retrieved pinned

County ditch projects in the accepted GIS snapshot

115 projects

as pinned · derived

What this tells usThe environment brief publishes 115 public ditch project lines in the accepted county GIS snapshot. None is joined to this place; the figure is the county's, not the site's.
What remains unknownWhether any ditch project drains this place. The county lines are not joined to parcels on this site.
Open the sourceR9128318 · avonlake.city environment brief, pinned figures (environment_figures.json, version 1) · retrieved pinned

County drainage features mapped

13809 features

as pinned · derived

What this tells usThe environment brief publishes 13809 allowlisted drainage line features county-wide. The figure describes the county map, not this place.
What remains unknownWhich features, if any, touch this place. No drainage feature is joined to a parcel here.
Open the sourceR9128318 · avonlake.city environment brief, pinned figures (environment_figures.json, version 1) · retrieved pinned
This site · Every fact below is scoped to the named parcels. Facts that cannot be computed at another scale say so in place.
  • Rezoned property, the city's figure: 43.23 acres
  • Planned park land: 23.22 acres
  • Planned public purchase: $15,000,000
  • Recorded consideration on transfer: $0
  • Flood zone intersection: 3 of 4 parcels
  • Facility records within the radius: Not computed at this scale: the count is taken over the declared radius, not over the place's own land.
  • Permits within the radius: Not computed at this scale: the count is taken over the declared radius, not over the place's own land.
  • Council matters with a published roll-call: Not computed at this scale: a city-wide council figure is not a fact about this site's land.
  • Council matters with an exact declared recusal: Not computed at this scale: a city-wide council figure is not a fact about this site's land.
  • County ditch projects in the accepted GIS snapshot: Not computed at this scale: the county engineer's figure is not scoped below the county; nothing joins it to this site's land.
  • County drainage features mapped: Not computed at this scale: the county engineer's figure is not scoped below the county; nothing joins it to this site's land.
Nearby · 500 m · Facts cover the declared radius. Site-only facts are marked not computed at this scale.
  • Rezoned property, the city's figure: Not computed at this scale: acreage is summed over the registry parcels; nearby land is not part of the place.
  • Planned park land: Not computed at this scale: acreage is summed over the registry parcels; nearby land is not part of the place.
  • Planned public purchase: Not computed at this scale: the agreement names land inside the place, not nearby land.
  • Recorded consideration on transfer: Not computed at this scale: the deeds name the registry parcels only.
  • Flood zone intersection: 3 of 4 parcels
  • Facility records within the radius: 32 facility records
  • Permits within the radius: 4 permit records
  • Council matters with a published roll-call: Not computed at this scale: a city-wide council figure is not a fact about the nearby radius.
  • Council matters with an exact declared recusal: Not computed at this scale: a city-wide council figure is not a fact about the nearby radius.
  • County ditch projects in the accepted GIS snapshot: Not computed at this scale: the county engineer's figure is not scoped below the county; nothing joins it to the nearby radius.
  • County drainage features mapped: Not computed at this scale: the county engineer's figure is not scoped below the county; nothing joins it to the nearby radius.
City · City scope reads existing municipal pins only. Site and nearby facts are marked not computed at this scale.
  • Rezoned property, the city's figure: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned city land figure for this measure.
  • Planned park land: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned city land figure for this measure.
  • Planned public purchase: Not computed at this scale: a single agreement is not a city aggregate.
  • Recorded consideration on transfer: Not computed at this scale: transfer consideration is not aggregated at city scale on this site.
  • Flood zone intersection: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned city flood-intersection figure.
  • Facility records within the radius: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned city facility or permit count.
  • Permits within the radius: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned city facility or permit count.
  • Council matters with a published roll-call: 206 matters
  • Council matters with an exact declared recusal: 1 matters
  • County ditch projects in the accepted GIS snapshot: Not computed at this scale: the county engineer's figure is not scoped below the county; nothing joins it to the city.
  • County drainage features mapped: Not computed at this scale: the county engineer's figure is not scoped below the county; nothing joins it to the city.
County · County scope reads pinned county briefs only. Facts without a pinned county figure are marked not computed at this scale.
  • Rezoned property, the city's figure: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned county land figure for this measure.
  • Planned park land: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned county land figure for this measure.
  • Planned public purchase: Not computed at this scale: a single agreement is not a county aggregate.
  • Recorded consideration on transfer: Not computed at this scale: transfer consideration is not aggregated at county scale on this site.
  • Flood zone intersection: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned county flood-intersection figure.
  • Facility records within the radius: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned county facility or permit count.
  • Permits within the radius: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned county facility or permit count.
  • Council matters with a published roll-call: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned county council figure.
  • Council matters with an exact declared recusal: Not computed at this scale: there is no pinned county council figure.
  • County ditch projects in the accepted GIS snapshot: 115 projects
  • County drainage features mapped: 13809 features
Stages

Five project stages, kept separate from the broader evidence states. An empty stage is a finding, not a gap in the page.

1 · Proposed
Proposed

R15695302 · Avon Lake and Power Plant Site Owners Discuss Development Agreement That Includes City Ownership of 23 Acres of Lakefront Land

2 · Approved
Approved

R728468 · ORDINANCE NO. 24-143: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH AVON LAKE ENVIRONMENTAL REDEVELOPMENT GROUP AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.

3 · Financed
None in archive

None in archive: no record documents this stage.

4 · Paid
None in archive

None in archive: no record documents this stage.

5 · Delivered
None in archive

None in archive: no record documents this stage.

What changed?

Compare the record at two dates.

The comparison is computed from the dated events above. It shows which registers had evidence at each date. It does not claim continuous coverage between them. A year without a day is placed at the end of that year.

Register2007-12-072026-10-07
Transfers recordedConveyance 2007094625 recorded by the county auditor on 2007-12-07 (instrument not…Conveyance 2007094625 recorded by the county auditor on 2007-12-07 (instrument not…; Conveyance 2022094719 recorded by the county auditor on 2022-10-24 (GENERAL WARRANTY…
Decisions passedNone by this dateORDINANCE NO. 24-143: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN INTERIM…; RESOLUTION NO. 25-182: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF AVON LAKE TO APPLY FOR AND…; ORDINANCE NO. 25-167: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A REAL ESTATE…; ORDINANCE NO. 26-37: AN ORDINANCE REZONING A 43.23-ACRE SITE AT [street number withheld]…; ORDINANCE NO. 26-36: AN ORDINANCE ENACTING AVON LAKE CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 1219:…
Project stages documentedNone by this dateAvon Lake and Power Plant Site Owners Discuss Development Agreement That Includes City…
Stage: proposedNot yet documentedDocumented
Stage: approvedNot yet documentedDocumented
Stage: financedNone in archiveNone in archive
Stage: paidNone in archiveNone in archive
Stage: deliveredNone in archiveNone in archive

Every dated event in the strip is included in this comparison.

Nearby · 500 m

Facility and permit records inside the radius, labelled by distance and source.

NameKindDistanceLocation source
PHIL'S SHELL SERVICEFacility recordinside or touching a site parcelepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
Watteredge LLCFacility recordinside or touching a site parcellorain_county_gis_parcels
Unnamed facility frs:110020978307Facility recordinside or touching a site parcellorain_county_gis_parcels
AVON LAKE POWER PLANT (0247030013)Facility recordinside or touching a site parceloh_epa_gis_npdes_permits
Southwire Avon LakeFacility recordinside or touching a site parcellorain_county_gis_parcels
LIQUID THERAPYFacility recordinside or touching a site parcelepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
AVON LAKE POWER PLANTFacility recordinside or touching a site parcelepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
Lubrizol Advanced Materials - Avon LakeFacility record3 mlorain_county_gis_parcels
LUBRIZOL ADVANCED MATERIALSFacility record3 mlorain_county_gis_parcels
Ford Motor Co Ohio Assembly PlantFacility record31 mlorain_county_gis_parcels
AVIENT CORPFacility record35 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
MEXICHEM SPECIALTY RESINS INCFacility record53 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
ALUMALLOY METALCASTING CO.Facility record64 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
ARROW ALUMINUM CASTINGS COFacility record113 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
ALUMALLOY METALCASTING CO.Facility record121 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
FORD MOTOR CO - OHIO ASSEMBLY PLANTFacility record160 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
HELICAL LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY (0247030987)Facility record174 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
CENTRAL TRUST COFacility record203 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
WATTEREDGE LLCFacility record207 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
RYKON ACQUISITIONS LLC DBA RYKON PLATINGFacility record227 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
ERIE INDUSTRIAL SERVICESFacility record241 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
AVON LAKE WPCFFacility record249 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
Avon Lake WPCFFacility record260 moh_epa_gis_npdes_permits
Unnamed facility pwsid:OH4700311Facility record316 mlorain_county_gis_parcels
Avon Lake Regional WaterFacility record316 mlorain_county_gis_parcels
AVON LAKE REGIONAL WATERFacility record316 mlorain_county_gis_parcels
Ford Ohio Assembly PlantFacility record335 moh_epa_gis_npdes_permits
WESTVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFacility record344 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
AVON LAKE WATER FILTRATION PLANTFacility record368 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
ALERG, LLCFacility record463 moh_epa_gis_npdes_permits
ALERG, LLCFacility record463 moh_epa_gis_npdes_permits
AVON LAKE MARATHONFacility record482 mepa_envirofacts_echo_44012
permit-bd2d465c3f33Permit record106 msource point; address not shown
permit-4aab7ee91390Permit record363 msource point; address not shown
permit-e69028378759Permit record409 msource point; address not shown
permit-e7e1e0a70d9fPermit record494 msource point; address not shown

“Location source” is the record the point was read from, not where the name came from; zero metres means the point is inside or touching a site parcel. Facilities without an authority-gated location are not drawn and not listed (0 inside the radius), and 10 facility records and 1 permit record inside the radius were withheld because their parcel is residential or its land use is not proved in the county generation.

Methods, in one paragraph

Methods

This page is built from the public record at build time, not live. Figures were derived from stored county, city, state, and federal records and checked against committed pins. The nearby radius is 500 m, declared for this place by its editor and printed here. Parcel numbers are shown because the site's editor reviewed this reviewed private redevelopment site as a declared public place. No owner, taxpayer, mailing, contact, or household field enters the page; the bundle's privacy check is version 1. Places on this site are reviewed, non-residential sites or public assets; there is no page for a home. Nearby points must prove themselves: a facility or permit record is listed only when it falls inside an active-generation parcel with a recorded, non-residential land use, so 10 facility records and 1 permit record inside the radius were withheld, and 0 facility records with no authority-gated location were never drawn. “Archive snapshot” (the arch date on each event and the newest-fetch date in the header) is the newest stored fetch among the parcel generation and the transfer, decision, stage, FEMA, facility, and permit evidence used here. It is not the date this page was published. The map is drawn from public geometry and makes no request to any other server. Full doctrine: How to read this site. Corrections: About.

Bundle JSON Read the investigation

Receipts

Records supporting this page, linked where publication policy permits.